mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js.git
synced 2025-04-20 07:08:08 +02:00
757636d519
This patch was tested using the PDF file from issue 2618, i.e. https://bug570667.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=226471, with the following manifest file: ``` [ { "id": "issue2618", "file": "../web/pdfs/issue2618.pdf", "md5": "", "rounds": 50, "type": "eq" } ] ``` which gave the following results when comparing this patch against the `master` branch: ``` -- Grouped By browser, stat -- browser | stat | Count | Baseline(ms) | Current(ms) | +/- | % | Result(P<.05) ------- | ------------ | ----- | ------------ | ----------- | --- | ---- | ------------- firefox | Overall | 50 | 3417 | 3426 | 9 | 0.27 | firefox | Page Request | 50 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.41 | firefox | Rendering | 50 | 3416 | 3426 | 9 | 0.27 | ``` Based on these results, there's no significant performance regression from using standard classes and this patch should thus be OK. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| chromium | ||
| font | ||
| integration | ||
| pdfs | ||
| resources | ||
| stats | ||
| ttx | ||
| types | ||
| unit | ||
| .eslintrc | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| add_test.js | ||
| annotation_layer_builder_overrides.css | ||
| downloadutils.js | ||
| driver.js | ||
| integration-boot.js | ||
| test.js | ||
| test_manifest.json | ||
| test_slave.html | ||
| testutils.js | ||
| text_layer_test.css | ||
| webserver.js | ||