The `waitForTimeout` function should not be used anymore and only exists
for old usages that have to be rewritten, but there was nothing in place
to signal this. This commit therefore implements a linting rule, specific
to the integration tests, to make it clear that this function should no
longer be used. We exclude the old usages from it because we are already
tracking those in #17656 (so this patch is mostly to not make the scope
of that issue bigger).
The PDF specification states that empty dash arrays, i.e. arrays with
zero elements, are in fact valid. In that case the dash array simply
corresponds to a solid, unbroken line. However, this case was erroneously
being flagged as invalid and therefore the annotation was not drawn
because its width was set to zero. This commit fixes the issue by
allowing dash arrays to have a length of zero.
This commit removes the final callbacks in this code by switching to a
promises-based interface, overall simplifying the code. Moreover, we
document why we write to files on disk and modernize the code using e.g.
template strings.
The original `test.py` code, see
c2376e5cea/test/test.py,
did not have any timeout logic for TTX, but it got introduced when
`test.py` was ported from Python to JavaScript as `test.js` in
c2376e5cea (diff-a561630bb56b82342bc66697aee2ad96efddcbc9d150665abd6fb7ecb7c0ab2f).
However, I don't think we've ever actually seen TTX timing out.
Moreover, back then we used a very old version of TTX and ran the font
tests on the bots (where a hanging process would block other jobs and
would require a manual action to fix), so this code was most likely
only included defensively.
Fortunately, nowadays it should not be necessary anymore because we use
the most recent version of TTX (which either returns the result or
errors out, but isn't known to hang on inputs) and we run the font tests
on GitHub Actions which doesn't block other jobs anymore and also
automatically times the job out for us in the unlikely event that a hang
would ever occur.
In short, we can safely remove this logic to simplify the code and to get
rid of a callback.
This replaces our custom `PromiseCapability`-class with the new native `Promise.withResolvers()` functionality, which does *almost* the same thing[1]; please see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/withResolvers
The only difference is that `PromiseCapability` also had a `settled`-getter, which was however not widely used and the call-sites can either be removed or re-factored to avoid it. In particular:
- In `src/display/api.js` we can tweak the `PDFObjects`-class to use a "special" initial data-value and just compare against that, in order to replace the `settled`-state.
- In `web/app.js` we change the only case to manually track the `settled`-state, which should hopefully be OK given how this is being used.
- In `web/pdf_outline_viewer.js` we can remove the `settled`-checks, since the code should work just fine without it. The only thing that could potentially happen is that we try to `resolve` a Promise multiple times, which is however *not* a problem since the value of a Promise cannot be changed once fulfilled or rejected.
- In `web/pdf_viewer.js` we can remove the `settled`-checks, since the code should work fine without them:
- For the `_onePageRenderedCapability` case the `settled`-check is used in a `EventBus`-listener which is *removed* on its first (valid) invocation.
- For the `_pagesCapability` case the `settled`-check is used in a print-related helper that works just fine with "only" the other checks.
- In `test/unit/api_spec.js` we can change the few relevant cases to manually track the `settled`-state, since this is both simple and *test-only* code.
---
[1] In browsers/environments that lack native support, note [the compatibility data](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/withResolvers#browser_compatibility), it'll be polyfilled via the `core-js` library (but only in `legacy` builds).
The original bug was because the parent was null when trying to show
an highlight annotation which led to an exception.
That led me to think about having some null/non-null parent when removing
an editor: it's a mess especially if a destroyed parent is still attached
to an editor. Consequently, this patch always sets the parent to null when
deleting the editor.
The following are some highlights of this patch:
- In the Worker we only extract a *subset* of the potential contents of the `Usage` dictionary, to avoid having to implement/test a bunch of code that'd be completely unused in the viewer.
- In order to still allow the user to *manually* override the default visible layers in the viewer, the viewable/printable state is purposely *not* enforced during initialization in the `OptionalContentConfig` constructor.
- Printing will now always use the *default* visible layers, rather than using the same state as the viewer (as was the case previously).
This ensures that the printing-output will correctly take the `Usage` dictionary into account, and in practice toggling of visible layers rarely seem to be necessary except in the viewer itself (if at all).[1]
---
[1] In the unlikely case that it'd ever be deemed necessary to support fine-grained control of optional content visibility during printing, some new (additional) UI would likely be needed to support that case.
