Ensure that we never round the canvas dimensions above `maxCanvasPixels`
by rounding them to the preceeding multiple of the display ratio rather
than the succeeding one.
This commit introduces a test to ensure that:
- When zooming below the maxCanvasPixels limit, the canvas is rendered
with the correct size (the two sides are multiplied by the zoom factor).
- When zooming above the maxCanvasPixels limit, the canvas size is capped.
This has two advantages, as far as I'm concerned:
- The tests don't need to manually invoke multiple functions to properly clean-up, which reduces the risk of missing something.
- By collecting all the relevant clean-up in one method, rather than spreading it out, we get a much better overview of exactly what is being reset.
If for example dd:mm is failing we just try with d:m which is equivalent
to the regex /d{1,2}:m{1,2}/. This way it allows the user to forget the
0 for the first days/months.
There's no specification for that (even if it's possible to have an idea from
the xfa specs) so we just want to hide them in order to avoid to display something
wrong.
When an image has a non-zero SMaskInData it means that the image
has an alpha channel.
With JPX images, the colorspace isn't required (by spec) so when we
don't have it, the JPX decoder will handle the conversion in RGBA
format.
Instead of sending to the main thread an array of Objects for a list of points (or quadpoints),
we'll send just a basic float buffer.
It should slightly improve performances (especially when cloning the data) and use slightly less memory.
This parameter allows defining which point should remain
fixed while scaling the document. It can be used, for example,
to implement "zoom around the cursor" or "zoom around
pinch center".
The logic was previously implemented in `web/app.js`, but
moving it to the viewer scaling utilities themselves makes it
easier to implement similar zooming functionalities in
other embedders.
Note that the referenced file is trivially corrupt, since it contains *two* PDF documents placed in the same file which doesn't make sense (and isn't how a PDF document should be updated).
However it's still a good idea to ensure that `loadFont` is able to handle errors when resolving References, since that allows us to invoke the existing fallback font handling.
- Move the definition of the `loadingParams` Object, to simplify the code.
- Add a unit-test, since none existed and the viewer depends on this functionality.
Over time the number of integration tests that get the rectangle for a
given selector has increased quite a bit, and the code to do so has
consequently become duplicated.
This commit refactors the integration tests to move the rectangle
fetching code to a single place, which reduces the code by over 400
lines and makes the individual tests simpler.
This commit replaces most `waitForTimeout` occurrences with calls to
`waitForFunction` or `waitForSandboxTrip`. Note that the occurrences in
the "must check that focus/blur callbacks aren't called" test remain
until we find a good way to ensure that nothing happened after the tab
switches (because currently we can't be sure that nothing happens since
there is nothing to await).
This commit adds a test for 0603d1ac18.
Before the fix the `pagerendered` events would be fired just 2-3
milliseconds after the call to `increaseScale`/`decreaseScale`.
Fixes issue #16843.
In certain cases, the text layer was misaligned
due to a difference between the `lang` attribute
of the viewer and the canvas. This commit addresses
the problem by adding the `lang` attribute to the canvas.
The issue was caused because PDF.js uses serif/sans-serif
fonts to generate the text layer and relies on system fonts.
The difference in the `lang` attribute led to different fonts
being picked, causing the misalignment.
This also required changing the initial `charCodeToGlyphId`-data to an Object, which seems generally correct since it's consistent with existing code in the `src\core\{cff_font, type1_font}.js` files.
This is very old code, and predates e.g. the introduction of JavaScript classes, which creates unnecessarily unwieldy code in the viewer.
By introducing a new `TextLayer` class in the API, similar to how e.g. the `AnnotationLayer` looks, we're able to keep most parameters on the class-instance itself. This removes the need to manually track them in the viewer, and simplifies the call-sites.
This also removes the `numTextDivs` parameter from the "textlayerrendered" event, since that's only added to support default-viewer functionality that no longer exists.
Finally we try, as far as possible, to polyfill the old `renderTextLayer` and `updateTextLayer` functions since they are exposed in the library API.
For *simple* invocations of `renderTextLayer` the behaviour should thus be the same, with only a warning printed in the console.
The issue from #18003 hasn't been shown to be caused by PDF.js, but it
did surface that we don't have (direct) unit test coverage for the
`BaseException` class. This made it more difficult to prove that the
`stack` property was already available on exception instances, but more
importantly it caused the CI to be green even though the suggested
change would have caused the `stack` property to disappear.
To avoid future regressions, for e.g. similar changes or a rewrite from
a closure to a proper class, this commit introduces a dedicated unit
test for `BaseException` that asserts that our exception instances
indeed expose all expected properties.
When seleciting on a touch screen device, whenever the finger moves to a
blank area (so over `div.textLayer` directly rather than on a `<span>`),
the selection jumps to include all the text between the beginning of the
.textLayer and the selection side that is not being moved.
The existing selection flickering fix when using the mouse cannot be
trivially re-used on mobile, because when modifying a selection on
a touchscreen device Firefox will not emit any pointer event (and
Chrome will emit them inconsistently). Instead, we have to listen to the
'selectionchange' event.
The fix is different in Firefox and Chrome:
- on Firefox, we have to make sure that, when modifying the selection,
hovering on blank areas will hover on the .endOfContent element
rather than on the .textLayer element. This is done by adjusting the
z-indexes so that .endOfContent is above .textLayer.
- on Chrome, hovering on blank areas needs to trigger hovering on an
element that is either immediately after (or immediately before,
depending on which side of the selection the user is moving) the
currently selected text. This is done by moving the .endOfContent
element around between the correct `<span>`s in the text layer.
The new anti-flickering code is also used when selecting using a mouse:
the improvement in Firefox is only observable on multi-page selection,
while in Chrome it also affects selection within a single page.
After this commit, the `z-index`es inside .textLayer are as follows:
- .endOfContent has `z-index: 0`
- everything else has `z-index: 1`
- except for .markedContent, which have `z-index: 0`
and their contents have `z-index: 1`.
`.textLayer` has an explicit `z-index: 0` to introduce a new stacking context,
so that its contents are not drawn on top of `.annotationLayer`.
For images that failed to decode once we want to avoid a pointless round-trip to the main-thread, which could otherwise happen for globally cached images.
- These changes will allow a simpler way of implementing PR 17770.
- The /Lang attribute is fetched lazily, with the first `getTextContent` invocation. Given the existing worker-thread caching, this will thus only need to be done *once* per PDF document (and most PDFs don't included this data).
- This makes the /Lang attribute *directly available* in the `textLayer`, which has the following advantages:
- We don't need to block, and thus delay, overall viewer initialization on fetching it (nor pass it around throughout the viewer).
- Third-party users of the `textLayer` will automatically benefit from this, once we start actually using the /Lang attribute in PR 17770.
*Please note:* This also, importantly, means that the `text` reference-tests will then cover this code (which wouldn't otherwise have been the case).
